ABC’s ‘V’ a Correlation on Obama mania?

http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/chi-tc-tvcolumn-v-1102-1103nov03,0,7062976.story

Now, I have to admit I’ve been planning on watching this show as it looked interesting. Never did I anticipate that it would be intentionally correlating between invading aliens and Obama. Now I really need to see it.

Now, this is a story by the Chicago Tribune and their definition of ‘Obama bashing’ and mine are probably very different so we may still be disappointed.  Still, there might be hope for change! ;-)


Posted Nov 03 2009, 01:47 PM by mefree

Comments

mefree wrote re: ABC’s ‘V’ a Correlation on Obama mania?
on 11-03-2009 2:14 PM

This is a users comment from the Chicago article that I find hilarious!

Nahh, Obama is not a space alien destroying the US. He is a Kenyan alien illegally occupying the US presidency destroying the USA.

Awesome.

mefree wrote re: ABC’s ‘V’ a Correlation on Obama mania?
on 11-04-2009 7:59 AM

So,did anyone watch it?  I thought it was great and t did take shots at Obama mania!  Go ABC for once!

violentj wrote re: ABC’s ‘V’ a Correlation on Obama mania?
on 11-07-2009 9:36 AM

Nicely said about the Kenyan occupation of the White House. Cool points to you. I haven't watched it as I have no cable/sat. or anything other than a VCR and DVD player since 90%+ of everything on anymore is an IQ vaccume. The only thing I used to watch were the nerd channels like History, Military, discovery, etc. I loved those but they aren't worth having my kids veg. in front or the tard tube and be either indoctorinated that morals are outdated or watch one of the endless shows written, dirrected, and cast by morons and fops. This show may grab my attention though.

RationalRepublican wrote re: ABC’s ‘V’ a Correlation on Obama mania?
on 11-07-2009 10:46 AM

If V is corrolated to Obamania, I offer "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" as highy corrolated with the goings on in the Bush administration.   Seems to fit nicely.  I will have to watch V. But I can't imagine people more slavish than those to the bush adminstration.  Although today the cloud of amnesia has settled in and people seem to forget little statements made and agreed to like:  Negative comments about the President in time of war is TREASON!!!!    Funny thing we are still at war.  Ah perhaps calling the President a Nazi does not count?

Shouldn't V by Republican and FOX's definition be considered unpatriotic?  I think people might as well fess up and admit what FOX and many on this web site really mean is: If you don't agree with me then you are unpatriotic.  Silly but it would at least be consistent. I on the other hand do not agree with the histronics, but I have never called anyone unpatriotic for disagreeing with the current President.  That is call consistency for those that do not recognize it.

I expect more from americans because of the history of our country founded as it was on dissent but then I guess if the leader of the Republican Party In the House of the Congress of the United States does not know the difference between the Constituion and the Declaration of Independece, even though he carries the constitution with him every where he goes (perhaps he can't read?) ,I should not expect that other republicans have read it either.  If John Boehner is the best Republican's have, we are truely doomed.

Powered by Community Server (Non-Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems